Digital bodies, territories in dispute.
Feminist analysis of digital violence against women human rights defenders in Mesoamerica.
Women defenders in Mesoamerica face increasingly complex contexts, where the rise of digital attacks and the dispute for digital space are ever present. Between 2020 and 31 October 2024, our Mesoamerican Registry of Attacks against Women Defenders documented 7,406 digital attacks in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and Nicaragua. This accounts for one in four of all attacks registered in the period. The most frequent types of digital attacks were harassment; disseminating false information; smear campaigns; challenging or questioning women defenders’ or their organizations’ morality, credibility, or leadership; and threats. The vast majority of attacks were perpetrated through social media. The women defenders most attacked through digital channels are those who defend the right to truth, justice, and reparations; the right to political participation and to participate in decision-making spaces; and those who work for the right to information and freedom of expression.
This reality and its impact on our lives and struggles, and on our movements, were exposed during the COVID-19 syndemic when, due to imposed isolation strategies, the digital sphere suddenly became crucially relevant for defending human rights. In response, States and de facto powers dedicated significant resources and efforts to silence women defenders’ voices and their presence in digital spaces. This violence is no more than an extension of the repression that we have historically suffered.
IM-Defensoras has taken a critical and feminist approach to reflect on the reality facing Mesoamerican women defenders in the digital sphere. And so, towards the end of 2023, we began a process to collectively build knowledge – a participatory research effort that, based on the experiences of women defenders in their territories, allowed us to recognize the digital sphere as a territory in dispute, and to identify feminist holistic protection strategies to confront this.
The process involved simultaneous research efforts in Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Mexico, and included interviews with women defenders and digital security experts in the region, surveys, legal analysis, and literature reviews. By working together with the networks in each country and with the support of feminist experts in protection and digital care, we were able to identify and understand the different ways that women defenders in Mesoamerica relate to technology.
We identified the methods used by those who exercise digital violence against women defenders, and the threads that connect these attacks with the violence we experience in the physical sphere. We also explored the effects of this violence on our bodies, families, communities, territories, movements, and struggles. In addition, the analysis of legal and regulatory frameworks in each country allowed us to understand how these have become instruments to silence human rights defenders.
This collective work will contribute to strengthening Feminist Holistic Protection (FHP) strategies by bringing in a specialized perspective from the intersection of digital technologies, feminisms, and human rights defense; understanding the digital territory not as an isolated space, but rather as a continuum of our lives as women defenders that provides an opportunity to broaden our presence, voices, and demands.
What are the main forms of attack that we face in digital territories?
-
Intimidation
-
Delegitimizing our work
-
Gender disinformation, which involves actions that seek to damage our public image by disseminating false or misleading narratives based on our gender and/or sexuality.
-
Digital harassment
-
Threats to our integrity and that of our close circle
-
Digital sexual violence
-
Illegal electronic surveillance
-
De-anonymization, meaning to reveal sensitive personal information about us in public spaces such as social media, for example, sharing our home or work address, publishing photographs of our children, our telephone number, etc.
Why do they attack us in the digital sphere?
-
To silence our critical voices
-
To demobilize us, seeking to inhibit our participation and that of other women and sex-gender dissidents in human rights defense work
-
To stigmatize us and delegitimize our voices and our work
-
To discipline us for being women and sex-gender dissidents who disobey the patriarchal gender mandate that wants us to be silent and confined to the private sphere
Who are our main digital assailants?
-
Actors linked to the State
-
Public officials
-
Mining companies
-
Organized crime
-
Conservative and anti-rights groups
-
Candidates to public office
-
Actors in our close circle:
Colleagues
Family members
Neighbors
Other activists in our movements
Friends
Ex-partners
How do digital attacks work?
-
Criminalizing our work through public statements, threats, laws, etc.
-
Constantly monitoring our activities
-
Gathering personal data, including information related to our intimate sphere
-
Attacking us in specific strategic moments
-
Accusing our social movements of being internal enemies of the community or society
-
Taking advantage of the hegemonic media’s complicity
-
Harassing independent, alternative, and critical media
-
Carrying out strategies to viralize attacks by using hashtags, trolls, influencers, campaigns, etc.
-
All this in a context of widespread impunity marked by:
Social normalizing of digital violence
Weak legal frameworks
Distrust in reporting to authorities
Growing inefficiency of social media platforms’ support channels for women defenders
Difficulties in exposing who is behind the attacks
Opting not to denounce because of the emotional and economic toll that this entails
How does digital violence affect us?
-
It creates fear and demobilizes us, often completely paralyzing our activism
-
It subjects us to emotional exhaustion
-
It carries material and political costs
-
It may lead us to lose our jobs
-
Some of us are forced to move from the place where we live
-
It forces us to be extremely cautious and careful, and to self-censure what we post on social media
-
It often leads us to leave social media
-
It leads to loss of credibility and legitimacy in the eyes of our movements, communities and other actors and entities.